If so, please send us your correction. Es una nueva funcionalidad de Marca. Para poder aprovecharla al maximo accede con tu nombre de usuario Marca. Si no tienes usario de Marca. Es totalmente gratis. Send to multiple recipients separating emails with a comma.
Click here to send the correction Your name Your email Terms of use Please fill in the form if you detect an error on this page. Everywhere Threads This forum This thread. Search Advanced…. New posts. Search forums. Chicharito or Falcao?
Thread starter nick Start date Feb 15, Where oh where on earth do we and Ole go from here? JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Which one to keep?
Falcao Votes: 34 Chicharito Votes: Total voters Joined Sep 22, Messages 3, Location Lost in the desert If we can only keep one of them next summer, do you prefer to keep Chicharito or Falcao? Devil may care Full Member. Joined Jan 7, Messages 35, Neither, but I guess if the question is from the viewpoint of having to keep one of them then Hernandez as he's on about a 3rd of Falcao's wages. Pexbo Online influencer who has never watched Star Wars.
If I had to choose with no consideration for money, Falcao. Hernandez would be conpletely anonymous in this side. He's beyond horrible in the build up.
Scrumpet There are no words. If money weren't a consideration, the one who wants to be here. But it is so yeah. Varun Moderator Staff. Joined Mar 16, Messages 46, Location Mumbai. Pexbo said:. Hojoon Full Member. Joined Feb 20, Messages 8, Joined Nov 24, Messages 2, Location ga, usa.
Is Hernandez even playing football anymore? Last I heard about him is that he could be going to MLS. Nevertheless, if I had to choose, common sense would say that we gain more from keeping Hernandez than we do Falcao unless United somehow reduce Falcao transfer fee by more than half. Freak Born a freak always a freak. Joined May 8, Messages 20, Location Somewhere in your mind, touching a nerve. Ekeke Full Member.
Obviously Hernandez because we wouldnt have to spend a significant amount of money on Falcao. GledTheRed Full Member. Joined Mar 8, Messages 11, Location Twitter thread. Niether, both dinosaur strikers. Rednotdead Full Member. Joined Jan 6, Messages 4, Location Tewkesbury. First "Welbeck or Falcao", now "Hernandez or Falcao". It's a totally, utterly and completely irrelevant question. Hernandez was sent on loan because he wasn't good enough, never has been and never will be. Chicharito would take on a new role in Spain, where he would have added responsibility but also a greater opportunity to become a superstar.
He would no longer be forced to play in the shadows of Rooney, van Persie or even Falcao. Hernandez has picked up some valuable experience playing in the Premier League alongside such world class talents, but unless he is given the space and opportunities to showcase and continue developing his confidence and attacking talents, he'll likely never be more than a super sub.
That's why a change of scenery, a fresh start in Spain, would benefit Hernandez. He's a younger player who has still yet to reach his prime, and being thrust into a superstar role for the first time since his days at Guadalajara would be the best thing for him and his game at this point in his career.
0コメント